Commit 0dc71aad authored by protolambda's avatar protolambda

specs: fix text about finalization to insert missing proof examples

parent be5a4160
...@@ -847,9 +847,9 @@ finality-signals and batch-inclusion, the derived L2 chain will become irreversi ...@@ -847,9 +847,9 @@ finality-signals and batch-inclusion, the derived L2 chain will become irreversi
Note that this form of finalization only affects inputs, and nodes can then subjectively say the chain is irreversible, Note that this form of finalization only affects inputs, and nodes can then subjectively say the chain is irreversible,
by reproducing the chain from these irreversible inputs and the set protocol rules and parameters. by reproducing the chain from these irreversible inputs and the set protocol rules and parameters.
This is however completely unrelated to the outputs posted on L1, which require a form of proof like to finalize. This is however completely unrelated to the outputs posted on L1, which require a form of proof like a fault-proof or
Optimistic-rollup outputs like withdrawals on L1 are only labeled "finalized" after passing a week without dispute zk-proof to finalize. Optimistic-rollup outputs like withdrawals on L1 are only labeled "finalized" after passing a week
(fault proof challenge), a name-collision with the proof-of-stake finalization. without dispute (fault proof challenge window), a name-collision with the proof-of-stake finalization.
[merge]: https://ethereum.org/en/upgrades/merge/ [merge]: https://ethereum.org/en/upgrades/merge/
[l1-finality]: https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/#finality [l1-finality]: https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/#finality
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment