Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in
Toggle navigation
N
nebula
Project
Project
Details
Activity
Releases
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
exchain
nebula
Commits
ddb6d809
Commit
ddb6d809
authored
Oct 02, 2023
by
Mark Tyneway
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
contracts-bedrock: add comment to `StandardBridge`
Explain the safety of `OTHER_BRIDGE` being an `immutable`
parent
1dbab583
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
4 additions
and
0 deletions
+4
-0
StandardBridge.sol
packages/contracts-bedrock/src/universal/StandardBridge.sol
+4
-0
No files found.
packages/contracts-bedrock/src/universal/StandardBridge.sol
View file @
ddb6d809
...
...
@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ abstract contract StandardBridge is Initializable {
/// @notice Corresponding bridge on the other domain. This public getter is deprecated
/// and will be removed in the future. Please use `otherBridge` instead.
/// This can safely be an immutable because for the L1StandardBridge, it will
/// be set to the L2StandardBridge address, which is the same for all OP Stack
/// chains. For the L2StandardBridge, there are not multiple proxies using the
/// same implementation.
/// @custom:legacy
/// @custom:network-specific
StandardBridge public immutable OTHER_BRIDGE;
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment